ajout biblio
This commit is contained in:
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Model 1: Crash}
|
||||
We consider a static set $\Pi$ of $n$ processes with known identities, communicating by reliable point-to-point channels, in a complete graph. Messages are uniquely identifiable. At most $f$ processes can crash, with $n \geq f$.
|
||||
We consider a static set $\Pi$ of $n$ processes with known identities, communicating by reliable point-to-point channels, in a complete graph. Messages are uniquely identifiable. At most $f$ processes can crash, with $n \geq f$, in the standard asynchronous crash-failure message-passing model~\cite{ChandraToueg96}.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Synchrony.} The network is asynchronous.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -298,6 +298,27 @@ For any operation $F \in O$,$F_i(...)$ denotes that the operation $F$ is invoked
|
||||
\bibliographystyle{plain}
|
||||
\begin{thebibliography}{9}
|
||||
% (left intentionally blank)
|
||||
\bibitem{frey:disc23}
|
||||
Davide Frey, Mathieu Gestin, and Michel Raynal.
|
||||
\newblock The synchronization power (consensus number) of access-control objects: The case of allowlist and denylist.
|
||||
\newblock {\em LIPIcs, DISC 2023}, 281:21:1--21:23, 2023.
|
||||
\newblock doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2023.21.
|
||||
|
||||
\bibitem{Bracha87}
|
||||
Gabriel Bracha.
|
||||
\newblock Asynchronous byzantine agreement protocols.
|
||||
\newblock {\em Information and Computation}, 75(2):130--143, 1987.
|
||||
|
||||
\bibitem{Defago2004}
|
||||
Xavier Defago, Andre Schiper, and Peter Urban.
|
||||
\newblock Total order broadcast and multicast algorithms: Taxonomy and survey.
|
||||
\newblock {\em ACM Computing Surveys}, 36(4):372--421, 2004.
|
||||
|
||||
\bibitem{ChandraToueg96}
|
||||
Tushar Deepak Chandra and Sam Toueg.
|
||||
\newblock Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems.
|
||||
\newblock {\em Journal of the ACM}, 43(2):225--267, 1996.
|
||||
|
||||
\bibitem{Schneider90}
|
||||
Fred B.~Schneider.
|
||||
\newblock Implementing fault-tolerant services using the state machine
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user